Showing posts with label nestle kills babies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nestle kills babies. Show all posts

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Nutrition officer job title: UNICEF versus Nestle

What does a nutrition officer do?


If you work for UNICEF:


The Nutrition Officer contributes to the overall effort of country programme implementation at state level within the framework of ICDS and micronutrients programmes under Health and education. Takes responsibility for extending technical assistance in planning, implementing and monitoring of high impact interventions. Supporting in system strengthening, promotion of childhood nutrition through ICDS and emergency nutrition, with special focus to those most vulnerable and unreached population groups.


In addition, provide co-ordinated support and technical assistance to ICDS, Health and Education Depts and management of on-going programmes statewide, through demonstrated strategies to reduce malnutrition.


Major Duties and Responsibilities

Programme Implementation

Supports the establishment/adaptation/refinement of measures for system strengthening and quality improvement to ensure continuity, effectiveness and sustainability of childhood nutrition, micronutrients and emergency nutrition services.


Undertakes responsibility for developing sector-and-project-specific work plans and activities. In the focus districts, support monitoring and implementation of the main thrusts of nutrition sector programme, such as address micronutrient malnutrition, (Vitamin A supplementation, school anemia programme for adolescent girls, and promotion of iodized salt); community based programs to address childhood malnutrition and ICDS systems quality improvement. In addition, supports and promotes desired family and community behaviors, in coordination with Programme Communication. Review and compile progress reports and input-output statistics and data analysis with specific reference to childhood nutrition and micronutrient nutrition.


Contributes to and enables the concurrent monitoring and reporting on performance indicators of the Integrated Child Development Services (Government flagship programme), accreditation systems and /or UNICEF–NGO managed programmes under the Project Co-operation Agreement.


Facilitates the integration of input/advice from the Child Development and Nutrition Section (Technical Centre for Excellence) in Delhi.




Building Partnerships

Collaborates with the state government, NGO Sector and new partners to identify interventions and activities necessary for improved planning, implementation and monitoring of childhood nutrition, micronutrient and emergency activities in the state. Provide technical assistance and evidence-based support to implementing partners.


Supports interactions within the state with national and international agencies, missions and commissions, on the management of Child Development and Nutrition programme. Participates in meetings with Departments of Social Welfare, Health and Family Welfare (and others as needed), responsible for programme/project reviews, and follows up on implementation of recommendations and agreements.

Contributes to partnerships for Child Development and Nutrition with government, other agencies, professional bodies, technical institutions and NGO networks in the state.

Contributes and supports the development and/or introduction of new approaches, methods and practices in project management and evaluation.


Monitoring and Evaluation

Contributes and supports review of systems and capacity related to delivery of services for Child Development and Nutrition, and the interventions to improve such systems and capacities.

Undertakes field visits to monitor programmes (including cash and supply assistance), as well as conducting periodic programme reviews with government counterparts and other partners.

Supports technical collaboration with other partners such as DFID, Care, World Bank and Micronutrient Initiative in the planning and management of programme/projects. Contributes to the identification and recommendation of necessary action for adjustments in the Child Development and Nutrition programme.

Contributes to the preparation of Situation Analysis, led by SPPME, by compiling data, analyzing and evaluating information, and providing inputs for the Child Development and Nutrition chapter of the Analysis.

Influencing Policy

Contributes to policy analysis and recommendations for shifts in management, risk allocation and coordination of service delivery related to young child nutrition, micronutrient and emergency. Establishes and maintains regular contacts with government officials, implementing partners at state and district levels through joint visits, consultations and travel.


Capacity Building and technical assistance for Government

Supports government authorities, in partnership with training institutions, to plan and organize capacity building programmes focusing the CD&N thrust areas of childhood nutrition, micronutrients and emergency nutrition. Identifies training needs for the purpose of capacity building and sustainability of programme/projects.


Assists government authorities, in partnership with training institutions, to plan and organize capacity building programmes in ICDS and Health on Infant and Young Child Nutrition, vitamin A supplementation programme, anemia control and iodized salt consumption initiatives and addressing severe acute malnutrition in children. Identifies training needs for the purpose of capacity building and sustainability of programme/projects. Provides technical expertise as required, facilitates learning exchanges as well as policy influencing.


Supports research and documentation on selected nutrition projects and tracking on social inclusion in Child Development and Nutrition interventions.


Inter-sectoral collaboration

Acts as a resource person on Nutrition to colleagues and also coordinate monitoring the programme in the state; advocate for promotion of nutrition and integrated interventions and bring convergence between health, nutrition and hygiene-sanitation strategies, activities, resources and policy. Pooling resources for more effective programming.

Assists in development of appropriate communication and information strategy to support and/or advocate development of IYCF, micronutrient nutrition and emergency nutrition to enable more effective change in key care behaviors related to feeding, hygiene and sanitation and disease management.


Supports strengthening of inter-sectoral collaboration within the state and/or sector with programme colleagues to share knowledge and programming experiences.




Supplies and Cash Assistance

Coordinates with the Operations/Supply staff/programme support on supply and non-supply assistance activities ensuring proper and timely UNICEF and Government accountability. Certifies disbursements of funds, as per UNICEF rules and procedures monitors and submits financial status reports to Program Manager/Chief Field Office as required.


Work plan development

Responsible for the development of the Child Development and Nutrition work plan, and facilitates compliance with specific assigned objectives.

Report Writing




Drafts programme/project inputs for donor proposals, status reports required for management Board, donors, budget review, programme analysis, annual reports, case studies, etc.



Qualifications And Competencies required to perform the duties of the post:


a) Education


University degree in any of the following: Nutrition, Public Health, Health or Hospital Management or Administration


b) Work Experience


Two years progressively responsible professional work experience in social development- preferably in child development and nutrition at state or district level, project administration, monitoring and evaluation.


c) Languages


Fluency in English and Hindi. Knowledge of local working language of the duty station an asset, especially fluency in Oriya.


1. Competency profile:


i) Core Values (Required)

• Commitment

• Diversity and Inclusion

• Integrity

ii) Core Competencies (Required)

• Communication [II]

• Working with People [I]

• Drive for Results [I]

iii) Functional Competencies (Required)

• Formulating Strategies and Concepts [I]

• Analyzing [II]

• Applying Technical Expertise [II]

• Planning and Organizing [II]

• Learning and Researching [II]



Technical Knowledge [ ]


a) Specific Technical Knowledge Required [ ]

(Technical knowledge requirements specific to the job can be added here as required.)

• Rights-based and Results-based approach and programming in UNICEF.

• UNICEF programme policy, procedures and guidelines in the Manual.

• Mid-Term Strategic Plan


b) Common Technical Knowledge Required (for the job group) [ ]
• Methodology of programme/project management

• UNICEF programmatic goals, visions, positions, policies and strategies.

• Knowledge of global human rights issues, specifically relating to children and women, and the current UNCEF position and approaches.

• UNICEF policies and strategy to address on national and international issues, particularly relating to conflicts, natural disasters, and recovery.

• UNICEF emergency programme policies, goals, strategies and approaches.


c) Technical Knowledge to be Acquired/Enhanced (for the Job) [ ]

• UN policies and strategy to address international humanitarian issues and the responses.

• UN common approaches to programmatic issues and UNICEF positions

• UN security operations and guidelines.

• UNSECORD training for members of Security Management Team.


Other Skills And Attributes


• In depth understanding and knowledge of the Child Development and Nutrition sector.


• Current knowledge of development issues, strategies, as well as programming policies and procedures in development cooperation.


• A strong familiarity as to how public administration systems affect delivery of results for children


• Understanding of social mobilization and behaviour change communication


• Understanding of the importance and role of partnerships.




• Proven ability to conceptualize, innovate, plan and execute ideas, as well as to impart knowledge and teach skills.


• Analytical, negotiating, communication and advocacy skills.


• Training ability.


• Computer skills, including internet navigation, and various office applications.


• Demonstrated ability to work in a multicultural environment, and establish harmonious and effective working relationships, both within and outside the organization.



What about a nutrition officer for say a multi-national company?


If you have that same job title and work for Nestle (direct from a job board)

A complete field job . It is a sales job wherein the candidate has to meet the doctors and inform them about the products of Nestle, conduct Seminars for doctors and arrange sysposiums.

Handling the Infant Nutrition Products.

1. Ensure recommendation of Nutrition Range by Health Care Professionals through Ethical Detailing, Scientific meetings and conferences in accordance with Head office guidelines.
2. To monitor and track the recent developments in the field of Nutrition and serve as a reliable source of information w.r.t the Nutrition knowledge for the Health Care Professionals. which will help them when dealing with their patients
3. To build and enhance the relationship with the existing HCPs and maintain an appropriate & effective call rate for contacts as per the Business requirement.
4. Ensuring improvisation and quality execution of the Medical Detailing calls through effective use of the Medical Detailing Management System and application of Professional Detailing skills.
5. To be a reliable source of market intelligence in his territory and alongside be aware of stock levels., stock freshness,prices of own and competitor productswhich would help him in understand better the 'market dynamics' of his territory.


Candidate Profile:Candidates have to be open to relocate anywhere in the 5 states ie Maharashtra, Gujarat, MP, CG, Goa as they may be posted in any of these states. Location is disclosed only after joining.
Candidates Open to relocate only should apply.
Candidates having experience in Pharma industry or Nutrition Industry only should apply.


Additional Information:
Education : B.Pharma - Pharmacy,B.Sc - Bio-Chemistry, Biology, Botany, Chemistry, Home science, Microbiology, Zoology

Experience : 0-2 years
Location : Maharashtra, Gujarat, MP, Chandigarh, Goa
Functional Area: sales


---

The difference?

For UNICEF the Nutition officer looks at nutrition and attempts to increase health, while for Nestle a nutrition officer works in sales and sells the product and gives kick backs to doctors for referring their product.

Ask your doctor if a nutrition officer has visited them!





Marketing through desensitizing

2012-08-25_111529The reason companies have marketing departments is because marketing works. It works well. It is also known that to try something new you need either trust it will work or discounts.

Multiple studies have shown that, when we market formula to women directly, breast feeding rates decrease and the length of breastfeeding decreases. And, in spite of WHO code requesting no discounts or direct marketing to moms, companies continue to do so.

Similac, due to their lovely partnerships with most state's WIC programs, has market corner in the US. But now to help women recognize their brand early on, similac now offers prenatal vitamins.



Complete with coupon.

Brand recognition.

Brand loyalty.

"I trusted this company while pregnant, they must be good for my baby too." Especially when sales people have titles like "Nutrition officer"... we have to wonder about the information we receive.

Nestle is doing a similar thing with "nestle milk" in India complete with an idyllic upper class woman with a comforting song enjoying milk in their commercial. Formula companies see India as the future for their profits (China has fewer children on the way, and they already have a lot of formula fed babies)... But, the US still has money to be made, especially since WIC allows formula companies to make money off of non-breast feeders


Friday, August 24, 2012

Nestle taken to court in India for improper marketing of infant formula

Nestle is still at their same tactics - wanting to gain market share and make money (they are a for profit company after all!) they are doing whatever it takes to market artificial breast milk substitutes to women.


I saw this come through my news feed recently:

Nestlé is in court in India for breaking baby milk marketing rules and formula was seized by the Indian Food and Drug Administration this month (August 2012) for breaking labelling requirements.
NestlĂ©'s response? Cause-related marketing, pushing its infant nutrition business and trying to improve its image by launching public events on the first 1000 days of life! 

 http://www.bpni.org/Nestle-Does-a-GREENWASH.html

How is Nestle Failing babies? They are failing to:

Print: "Mother's Milk is best for your baby" (they used a variation) and also they failed to have it in the Hindi script!! They also failed to write "Infant milk substitute or infant food is not the sole nourishment for an infant." They also failed to have this on print magazine advertisements. Sorry this is not a random omission - Nestle is known for horrible tactics against women and their babies and such a large company should know how to verify marketing laws!

Yes, this is an old case, that just still hasn't been settled, but slow to settle cases are common in India (unfortunately).

This Atlantic article regarding malnutrition is nice - let's solve malnutrition issues in India. Not by introducing more high cost formula but by, #1 supporting breastfeeding!

First and foremost, women should not be directly marketed to!

Support LLL India or an organization such as Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India.

Now remember, if a mom cannot afford formula, and may not have access to safe water... how does pushing formula help the baby?  In the mean time, this past week Danone is set to enter the market in India: India's infant nutrition sector is expanding rapidly and it is set to have a new entrant -

Last week, the French food group struck a deal to buy the nutrition business of local company Wockhardt Group, a move that means it will compete head on market leader Nestle.

Per the Just-Food website: "With over 25m children born each year, India is the fastest-growing infant nutrition market in the world," Danone said of the entire market beyond just infant formula, which mimics breast milk and is aimed at 0 to 12 month olds.

This must be stopped. Women of India, like women in the rest of the world, need support in breast feeding NOT more formula that they may not be able to afford.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Focus on WHO/Unicef positive initiatives

In an attempt to remain focused on my original goal (that admittedly was turned around and not my best idea ever), I am going to scour my news feed, the internet and take suggestions for posts regarding Nestle Boycott and/or the WHO/UNICEF Baby-Friendly initiatives.

In the mean-time, I'll start list of Nestle-boycot posts from other bloggers, groups, etc.

Like the other post, this lists those blogs/websites and will be updated as I come across more or they are introduced to me. Unlike the other, this list will also link to the blogs. The other list did not link, it was just a list.

List of Blogs and websites that support Baby-Friendly Initiative and/or Boycott Nestle.



Thursday, June 28, 2012

List of Unfollowed Mom Blogs due to marketing of formula

Currently REMOVED.

I've had this post up for a month and after posting a link to a blog advising them on their FB page that I was choosing to unfollow them since I choose to not support those who are supporting Nestle especially, I made a list of blogs I had unfollowed.

It was not a call to action.

I am human - I have teetered on whether or not I should use coupon dot com on my blog and I am considering that removal since there are often formula coupons on there.

If someone uses formula that is their choice. BUT, again, Nestle and other companies tactically use bloggers to break the WHO Code.

Read through information on formula marketing tactics. We all have our "things" that makes us tick... this is mine.

Governments have found that when they've allowed direct advertising like we have in the US, breastfeeding rates decrease drastically. This is why many countries and the WHO and UNICEF ascertain that women shouldn't be given free formula or marketed to directly. Most of us posting here, reading blogs, have access to clean water to mix formula with.... We have the ability to find resources if necessary... the women who are manipulated and are told in marketing campaigns that breast milk is not as good as formula (different than the ads we currently see in most of the western world), is the issue.


Darn Nestle! They're taking after Enfamil - Getting mamas to do their work

Please mommy bloggers, especially if you breastfeed, stop allowing these big companies to use YOU as their way to get more moms to stop breastfeeding.

Earlier in June reports came out that indicated most women don't meet their OWN breastfeeding goals. This isn't my goal for them. This isn't the government's goal for them. This is THEIR goals. So STOP helping Nestle (AKA Gerber) and Enfamil promote their products. This promotion type (direct to moms) is against the World Health Organization's code on marketing of breastmilk substitutes.

One stat said,
"More than 85% of new moms said they intended to breastfeed for three months or longer, but just 32.4% met their mark."


Many have stopped before they left the hospital. Formula companies are in almost all hospitals in the US, leaving samples to moms before they can even see a lactation consultant.

I posted earlier about Enfamil... but now I see people are doing the same for Gerber (which is really Nestle').

Yes, I will continue to stop following any mom blog who shows up with one of these promos in my news feed.

Again, MOMs have goals and these posts do not help them get there. 

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Nestle now to break WHO code in Philippines, legally

Nestle is at it again. In April, they were able to buy their way to a 60% market share in China's "babyfood" market, to help decrease their already abismal breastfeeding rate. And now, they are attempting to make their way into the Philippines vi a "law" that their lobbiests are proposing to amend the "Executive Order 51 (1986) - known as the 'milk code' - and its Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (2007)" to allow for advertising of breast milk substitutes (they call it baby milk, but those chemicals are NOT milks, sorry!), contact women directly (which is against the WHO code for advertising breast milk substitutes, AND to "train" and sponsor health care workers.

In the Philippines, logos on Nestle's formula has an explanation that misleads women saying it helps brain development. They are clearly lying, misleading and causing damage. This must be stopped. CLICK here to sign a petition. This will help protect families from malicious and against WHO code marketing.


Basically Nestle and other formula companies want into the Philippines becomes a lot of women there DO breastfeed, even though they've already done damage. Perhaps they'd like to be in Philippines like they are in Thailand, where only 5.4 percent of women are breastfeeding their babies.

From Baby Milk Action,the latest... this is relevant NOW. 

Press release 23 April 2012: Nestle purchase of Pfizer's SMA and other baby milk brands bad news for babies
Press release 19 April 2012: NestlĂ© Chairman rejects proposals from boycott coordinators at company AGM


Breastfeeding Rates in Philippines. 


According to Unicef:
Data point                                                             Percent
Early initiation of breastfeeding (%), (2006-2010*)
54
% of children (2006-2010*) who are: exclusively breastfed, (<6 months)
34
% of children (2006-2010*) who are: introduced to solid, semi-solid or soft foods, (6-8 months)
58
% of children (2006-2010*) who are: breastfed at age 2, (20-23 months)
34








 Basically, Philippines is doing decently well, no thanks to the action Nestle has already taken over the past 5 years - The people of the Philippines do not need Nestle's assistance in misleading families and harming babies. While most people in the Philippines have access to clean water, not all do. When you mix already substandard nutrition (ie, formula) with unclean water, a baby's health and life is at risk. It also is harmful when a mother cannot afford formula - it ends being watered down and not enough calories or nutrition is given. Women are able to breastfeed for free. Causing a mother who would otherwise breastfeed to change over due to marketing tactics with misleading and blatant lies is NOT okay.

Please, if you know anyone in the Philippines, let them know what Nestle is trying to do. Urge them to help protect mothers and their babies.

What should we do?


First, consider boycotting Nestle. A petition was set up online to help prevent a potential atrocity from occurring. According to the group putting together the petition:

  • According to the World Health Organisation 16,000 babies die every year in the Philippines due to inappropriate feeding. Companies make untrue claims implying that formula protects babies and boosts intelligence, while failing to provide adequate information on the risks to babies fed on formula or how to reduce the risks to babies who have to be fed on formula.

  • We call for the rights of mothers, babies and their families in the Philippines to be protected by strengthening the regulations, not weakening them. We call for legislators to fully implement the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes and subsequent, relevant Resolutions of the World Health Assembly.
 Research shows that advertising of formula is bad for women - it causes women to stop breastfeeding and Nestle knows it. But we also know that, "Infant mortality and morbidity risk is linked to formula usage. The proportion of Filipino infant formula users rose 6% between 2003 and 2008. It is hypothesized this rise resulted from aggressive formula industry marketing." (Sobel, et al, 2011)

Advertising works, but not necessarily for the better.





Friday, May 18, 2012

Who Breastfeeds? Which ethnic group breastfeeds most?


Who Breastfeeds?

Many women consider breastfeeding, but not all moms do breastfeed. Breastfeeding is great for bonding, nutrition and overall health. It is however, not something as wide-spread in the US, as the Healthy "goals' of 2010 had hoped. In fact the US was no where close to hitting that goal. But, there are some statistical groups that do breastfeed more than others. Hispanics more than anyone else. But of course, non-Hispanic babies also benefit from breastmilk!

Who is getting only human milk?


Only 10.7 babies are exclusively breasted in the US at least 3 months, and only 6.1 percent make the 6 months exclusive breastfeeding that is recommended by AAP.  Is early supplementation a reason for early weaning and non-continuation of breastfeeding?

Why aren't more moms breastfeeding?


According to the Journal of Human Lactation,
“In-hospital formula supplementation of breastfed infants negatively impacts breastfeeding duration. Infants from low-income families have some of the lowest exclusive breastfeeding rates in the United States. The objectives of this study were to identify (1) reasons low-income breastfeeding mothers begin in-hospital formula supplementation and (2) risk factors for in-hospital formula supplementation. We surveyed 150 low-income mothers in a Washington, DC, clinic. Sixty percent had initiated breastfeeding, and 78% of these breastfed infants received formula supplementation in the hospital. There was no clear medical need for supplementation for 87% of the breastfed infants receiving supplementation. Infants of mothers who did not attend a prenatal breastfeeding class were almost 5 times more likely to receive in-hospital formula supplementation than those infants whose mothers had attended a class (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.05-21.14). Improved knowledge about breastfeeding among nursing and medical providers is important to minimize unnecessary formula supplementation for breastfed infants.”
Again, I’m not indicating you have to breastfeed, but medical professionals who aren’t knowledgeable about breastfeeding definitely are a reason for increased cost to families and society. I know when my daughter was born a nurse (who wasn't the one lacatation consultant on staff at that hospital) basically told me right nipple was useless and it was inverted. It wasn't until I was pregnant with my second kid that I found out it wasn't inverted. I did nurse on that side, but I had assumed that whole time that my right boob had something wrong with it!!

Further, there are economic reasons TO breastfeed, thus those who are low/middle income would probably breastfeed more.. but that is not the case. In fact Ww know that families who have WIC tend to breastfeed less, but that number is slowly changing as more local WIC offices are employing breastfeeding peer counselors and securing more real food for families who choose to breastfeed, since real food costs less, perhaps the over $1,963,291,673 spent would be less if we had increased breastfeeding. Of course nutrition is important, but seeing that breast milk is a lot cheaper, increasing rates among the low and middle-income individuals would be better for health and for tax payers.

 It is also good to see breastfeeding rates increasing in the US, but this says nothing for the impact on shady marketing tactics in places such as China and Brazil by companies such as Nestle
For clarification purposes, how you feed your baby is up to you. For us, we recognize the benefits of breastfeeding and feel that families should choose breastfeeding as a first option, then pumped breastmilk, followed by formula. This is what AAP recommends as well as WHO.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

An update to the Pfizer - Nestle deal

The Pfizer-Nestle deal that I described on Sunday night has gone through. Nestle now has access to the 60 percent market share of Chinese babies who are not breastfed. The issue with this is that it is known that Nestle has ruthless tactics to prevent and undermine a mother's natural instinct and body. They have been known to dress up their SALES people in nurse's uniforms and introduce formula to women. Nestle will then give a twoish week supply of formula to the mom, and be on their way. Guess what... the "nurse" must  be right, formula is the way to go, right? Wrong. That two week supply will surely be enough time to pretty much dry up a woman's milk. Then what? They must go and buy formula. That mother may be in an area without access to clean water... Then what? Not only do we know that not breastfeeding increases risk to disease, but now we have babies being exposed to potential water-born illness. Then, mom can't even breastfeed baby through diarrhea... and guess what. Babies die. This is not the way to assist China in a (potential) population crisis.

Women do not need someone to tell them they're wrong for not breastfeeding. They need to be supported so that they can breastfeed successfully. Pregnant and new moms need multi-national corporations to follow the World Health Code for Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. Nestle is the worst of the worst and now... Chinese (and other) babies will suffer because of it.

What can we do? Support women! Bring them up! Help them find solutions and remind them that babies need and want mommy time! Dads can help with things OTHER than feeding and can bond in many different ways (including diaper changes! ha!)

Remind  people that breastmilk is the best baby food out there... not the chemical concoctions that Nestle and other companies market as alternatives.

The first alternative to breastfeeding is actually another woman's breastmilk, NOT formula! There are risks associated with formula use, but it isn't the end of the world, BUT women need support not Nestle taking over the world.

Did you read all that? Check for a post related to the cheapest way to cloth diaper without doing EC

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Another reason Nestle Kills babies - Pfizer deal, tainted baby food

The latest in Nestle's attempts to take over the world with their unhealth is apparent in their $11 billion deal with Pfizer. Pfizer? Yes, Pfizer, the drug company currently has the 5th corner in baby food in the world while Nestle's share of the market in China is dwindling due to tainted formula a few years back. In this "baby food" count is breast milk alternatives. So while Nestle continues to burden the world with their attempts to create a "second view" on the necessity of breastmilk, they are buying back some customers with this potential deal. Nestle already has top shares in the breastmilk alternative business... This deal will only increase the marketing that Nestle does that is clearly against the World Health Organization ( WHO ) Code for marketing of breastmilk alternatives. Nestle already has 17 percent share of the $27 billion (yes BILLION) market... do we really need an increased market for the unhealth brand?

I just love this quote at the bottom of the Bloomberg article: "Global sales of baby-food products are likely to gain 6 percent a year from 2011 to 2016, helped by low private-label penetration and the importance of infant nutrition to consumers, according to Euromonitor." Lovely, right?! Importance of infant nutrition would be to get more support for women to breastfeed for 6 months exclusively and 12-24 months with outside food. That would save lives. That would bring up nutrition in infants.


If you're interested in helping babies get the right nutrition, become a member of your local La Leche League. Mother to mother support really works.

Nestle kills babies and doesn't care what tactics they need to use. Boycott Nestle, protect baby's health.

Let people know you care about this deal and its affect on babies, share this post or another like it!

See Also: Breastmilk Recall, Nope its Nestle

Monday, March 12, 2012

Breastmilk recall - Nope its Nestle

Nestle again has to recall formula. Their Gerber brand baby formula is being recalled. Apparently having an off order and causing gastro issues in newborn babies isn't a "real" issue... For those uninterested in clicking, here's the info:

RECALL: Good Start® Gentle powdered infant formula 23.2 ounce plastic package from batch GXP1684 expiration date of March 5, 2013. Possible list of ingredients: WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE (FROM COW\'S MILK, ENZYMATICALLY HYDROLYZED, REDUCED IN MINERALS), vegetable oils (, PALM OLEIN, SOY, COCONUT, AND , HIGH-OLEIC SAFFLOWER, OR , HIGH-OLEIC SUNFLOWER) , LACTOSE, CORN MALTODEXTRIN, AND LESS THAN 2% OF: , POTASSIUM CITRATE, POTASSIUM PHOSPHATE, CALCIUM CHLORIDE, CALCIUM PHOSPHATE, SODIUM CITRATE, MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE, FERROUS SULFATE, ZINC SULFATE, SODIUM CHLORIDE, COPPER SULFATE, POTASSIUM IODIDE, MANGANESE SULFATE, SODIUM SELENATE, M.ALPINA OIL, C.COHNII OIL, SODIUM ASCORBATE, INOSITOL, CHOLINE BITARTRATE, ALPHA-TOCOPHERYL ACETATE, NIACINAMIDE, CALCIUM PANTOTHENATE, RIBOFLAVIN, VITAMIN A PALMITATE, PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, FOLIC ACID, PHYLLOQUINONE, BIOTIN, VITAMIN D3, VITAMIN B12, TAURINE, NUCLEOTIDES (, CYTIDINE 5\'-MONOPHOSPHATE, DISODIUM URIDINE 5\'-MONOPHOSPHATE, ADENOSINE5\'-MONOPHOSPHATE, DISODIUM GUANOSINE 5\'-MONOPHOSPHATE) , ASCORBYL PALMITATE, MIXED TOCOPHEROLS, L-CARNITINE, B. LACTIS CULTURES, SOY LECITHIN

And you can bet... a healthy momma who may even have a glass of wine and pizza, will still make better milk than an artificial milk! Oh and I don't see any recalls! Oh and its cheaper :)