Thank you to the following senators who listen to their constituents and not to Monsanto. Again, if Monsanto loved their products so much, why don't they want to allow labels on them? This wouldn't require labeling but allow states to require the labeling. WHAT THE?
They didn't even look at the following "farm bill" or "food" bills/amendments which, according to Organic Consumer's Association would:
See also: take a stance on GMOXMLU.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 112th Congress - 2nd Session
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
|
YEAs ---26 | ||
Akaka (D-HI) Begich (D-AK) Bennet (D-CO) Blumenthal (D-CT) Boxer (D-CA) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Feinstein (D-CA) Inouye (D-HI) | Johnson (D-SD) Kerry (D-MA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Lieberman (ID-CT) Manchin (D-WV) Merkley (D-OR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murkowski (R-AK) | Murray (D-WA) Reed (D-RI) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Tester (D-MT) Udall (D-NM) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wyden (D-OR) |
They didn't even look at the following "farm bill" or "food" bills/amendments which, according to Organic Consumer's Association would:
- Encourage more USDA-funded research on plant and animal breeding to improve health, nutrition, farm income, and food security.
- Allow the direct sale of raw milk and raw milk products across state lines.
- Legalize the production of industrial hemp, a potential new bumper crop for U.S. farmers.
- Codify an agreement between egg producers and the Humane Society of the United States to increase the size of hen cages over the next 18 years and end the practice of depriving hens of food and water to increase egg production.
In the mean-time, India WILL be labeling Genetically Modified food! WOO! Go India!
No comments:
Post a Comment